THE LIPSITE

Best story written about me


On the Peninsula
by Bryan Curtis
April 25, 2011 | 10:54pm

How Robert Lipsyte, author of the new memoir An Accidental Sportswriter, stood athwart the sports page yelling, "Stop!"

When a young man on the make tells me he wants to be a sportswriter, I tell him to read one book. It's called SportsWorld by Robert Lipsyte. Starting next month, I'll tell him to read another: An Accidental Sportswriter, which is functionally Lipsyte's sequel. In sportswriting's cosmic baseball card set—Jimmy Cannon! Dan Jenkins! Charlie Pierce!—you can find men who wrote as pretty as the former New York Times columnist. But Bob is the five-tool sportswriter. His beat is the ballpark, the '60s, African-American history, women's lib, Muslim theology, sports as metaphor, and—most interesting for you, young sportswriter—the craft of sportswriting itself.

Article - Curtis Lipsyte Jemal Countess /​ Getty Images An Accidental Sportswriter: A Memoir By Robert Lipsyte 256 pages. Ecco. $25.99.

Lipsyte is the guy who makes us ask the pencil-stopping question: Are sportswriters wasting their careers?

Bob—a pal—is 73 now, with a pair of hearing aids and a strip of infield grass stubbornly clinging to the sides of his head. His voice gets positively gleeful when he's saying something counterintuitive, which he nearly always is. Lipsyte was born in Queens in 1938. He likes to say he went to exactly two baseball games as a kid, which he didn't much enjoy. He went to his next game as a New York Times reporter.

"I was as close to tabula rasa as a sportswriter can be," Lipsyte says. After he graduated from Columbia at 19, his plan was to pack off to California and write novels. But a summer job on a water truck fell apart. So Lipsyte answered an ad to be a copyboy at The New York Times. He was dispatched to the sports desk, where his first mentor was Gay Talese. It was like young Mike Tyson walking into the mountain lair of Cus D'Amato.

Talese, the New Journalism maestro, would send Lipsyte on cocoa runs. "I don't want hot chocolate, Bob," Talese would say, "that's powder and water. I want milk, and that is how you tell them it should be cooked." Lipsyte soon got bored. He told Talese he wanted to quit the paper. "Bob," Talese said, "I will give you $5,000 in exchange for 10 percent of your earnings as a freelance writer for the next 10 years." Lipsyte was floored that Talese would place that kind of bet on a young writer, and he stayed at the Times.

In An Accidental Sportswriter, he revisits Talese, now in his elegant, legend-buffing dotage. Lipsyte asks, "Is there any possibility you could have been kidding around?" "Sure," Talese replies.

No matter, at age 21, Lipsyte was off the bench and contributing features and sidebars. The Times sent him to cover the 1964 title fight between Cassius Clay and Sonny Liston, where he met the Beatles. ("Who were those little sissies?" Clay asked Lipsyte later.) When Clay held the world title aloft, Lipsyte saw in the gleam of the belt sports and '60s social upheaval and his own careerism. "I'm going to own this story," he remembers thinking. He still has the ideas he scribbled down on a notepad that night: "Muslims…Malcolm…Clay's early life in Louisville…"

"The infectious values and myths transmitted by bad sportswriters," Lipsyte once wrote, "may be the deadliest words in the paper."

Muhammad Ali was a vessel through which Lipsyte smuggled big ideas onto the sports page. Ali liked Lipsyte. They were just four years apart in age. Lipsyte was curious—the nice part about tabula rasa is you see everyone anew—and had co-written Dick Gregory's Nigger. Mostly, Lipsyte was patient. He could sit through the hours of comic doggerel, religious dogma, and old-guard sportswriters asking questions about the "moos-lums." Then, when Ali's jive began to bend toward something like truth, Lipsyte snatched those thoughts for his column. No less than Malcolm X told Lipsyte that his boxing writing was some of the fairest he had read anywhere.

As a sports columnist, Lipsyte was a swaggering sociologist. "Bob understood the difference between the owners and the players," says David Meggyesy, a dissident linebacker who became a favorite Lipsyte subject. Tabula rasa. Where writers compared Ali to an "unwashed punk" draft dodger, Lipsyte saw a renegade and comic genius. Jack Scott and Harry Edwards, troublemakers elsewhere, were in Lipsyte's column heroic figures trying to pull sports out of antiquity. Lipsyte wasn't a sports-hater (a badge back-page anarchist Leonard Shecter wore), but he lacked the innate streak of fandom we typically associate with a sportswriter. Lipsyte didn't want to be Phil Pepe. "I wanted to be Philip Roth!"

As a writer, Bob was "on the peninsula," his old Times sports editor Neil Amdur says. (He wasn't quite on the island—that was Hunter Thompson at the Kentucky Derby.) After a few years, the seasonal drone of sports began to wear on him, and fiction beckoned. After Joe Frazier beat Ali in 1971, Lipsyte quit the Times. One of my favorite bits of trivia is that kindly old Red Smith, the sportswriter readers once set their watches by, replaced Lipsyte at the paper. When he walked away from one of the most powerful perches in sportswriting, Bob was 33 years old.

It's not unheard of for a sports-page veteran (Stanley Woodward, Leonard Shecter) to produce a work that leaves burn marks on the profession. Stung by the poor reviews of his thriller Liberty Two, Lipsyte was lugging a bigger canister of dynamite. Taken together, SportsWorld (1975) and An Accidental Sportswriter are a sustained attack on the mythos encrusted on sports and the journalists who helped to maintain it.

SportsWorld, Lipsyte wrote, is a "dangerous and grotesque web of ethics and attitudes, an amorphous infrastructure that acts to contain our energies, divert our passions, and socialize us for work or war or depression." Moreover, it's a "pacifier, safety valve…a concentration camp for adolescents and an emotional Disneyland for their parents…a buffer, a DMZ, between people and the economic and political systems that direct their lives."

The sound you hear is Ken Burns' head exploding. And Lipsyte was just getting started. Baseball: "an incredibly complex contrivance that seems to have been created by a chauvinistic mathematician." College football: "America's grandest monument to national hypocrisy." Vince Lombardi was "football's frontman while it was promoting itself as a sadomasochistic weekly adventure show," and hallowed Halls of Fame were "eerie crypts." About the Mets: "It would take at least a grand jury to get at the origins of the New York Mets"—truer than ever in the Madoff Era.

The sportswriters—the older guys, especially—were co-conspirators, pumping up athletes even though they knew the truth. Their attitude, Lipsyte says, was, "We're all of the carnival, and the rubes"—aka, the readers—"are out there."

Lipsyte dug in the box and took his swings. On Grantland "Granny" Rice, the first celebrity sportswriter: "The writer who likens a ballplayer to Hercules or Grendel's mother is displaying the ultimate contempt—the ballplayer no longer exists as a person or a performer, but as an object, a piece of matter to be used, in this case, for the furtherance of the sportswriter's career... Rice populated the press boxes with lesser talents who insisted, like the old master, that they were just sunny fellows who loved kids' games and the jolly apes who played them."

More: "A sportswriter learns early that his readers are primarily interested in the affirmation of their faiths and prejudices, which are invariably based on previous erroneous reports."

Still more: "We were complicit in keeping women out of press boxes, much less locker rooms. … Women diminished the prestige of our tree house, the men-only access we gloated over to friends and neighbors."

Red Smith wrote the "the purest, most crystalline, most delightful fresh running prose in sports," but until late in his career Smith was "polishing the SportsWorld silver." Bob Costas, he of the perpetually unlined forehead, is "one of the Jock Culture's most treasured cheerleaders. … Just look how happy he seems bantering with those ex-athletes on pregame shows, a terrier playing with mastiffs and Great Danes."

"The infectious values and myths transmitted by bad sportswriters," Lipsyte wrote in SportsWorld, now rising to a crescendo, "may be the deadliest words in the paper." This wasn't just superb gun-slinging. It was, in the world of the pressbox, a crisis of faith. Lipsyte the sportswriter is like Cherry Jones in a nun's habit, standing center stage and yelling, "I have doubts!"

* * *

Don't you, too, young sportswriter? What's riveting about Lipsyte's indictment is that it rings as true in the age of ESPN as it did in the days of the New York World-Telegram and Sun. As the sports page has gone digital, its "free advertising" has tentacled out even further. Mock drafts. Predictions columns. Notes columns. Arguments about who gets the next crypt in the Hall of Fame. (Whoops, I did that.) The endless Horatio Alger profiles, which Lipsyte calls "quasi-racist features about fatherless delinquents who rose from ghetto hellholes to become vicious linebackers who, off the field, played bass guitar, surprised Mama with a house, and ran a foundation for kids they had been."

It's not that modern sportswriters lack passion. But what passes for transgressive sportswriting today is mostly hot-stove news, where writers truck in deep background sources, where "trade rumors" (few of which come true) are hard currency. I still think of the scene in Moneyball when Billy Beane calls up Peter Gammons, tells him a fib, and savors the idea of Gammons disseminating it to the rest of the league. In this scoop-driven context of no context, I'm not sure even Gammons thinks he did anything wrong.

Most sportswriters aren't noxious. They're adrift. They haven't solved Lipsyte's riddle, which is: What is a sportswriter supposed to do? (They may have been waylaid by another mystery: What do website-clicking sports fans want?) Without a compass, they become unwitting comic players—Jimmy Cannon's "vaudevillians of journalism"—or, worse, prove the enduring libel of the sports section as the "toy department." With exceptions like the Times' indomitable Alan Schwarz, Joe Posnanski, and a minyan of magazine writers, old-media sportswriters are as questing as when Lipsyte left them in 1971. "There are all kinds of sportswriters," he writes in his new book, "simply because we are not sure if we are supposed to be reporters, critics, analysts, investigators, fabulists, moralists, comics, or shills for the games that make us possible."

Lipsyte updates his media critique in An Accidental Sportswriter. The dyspepsia is right, but some of the particulars are off. He goes in for the easy metaphor that writers missing steroids in the 1990s was like writers missing Iraq's WMD. Only the print-the-legend naïveté is the same, and conflating a misdemeanor with a felony serves to make sports look like a far bigger deal than it is.

In An Accidental Sportswriter, Lipsyte pays too little attention to the rebel band that appeared on the sportswriting fringe and has effectively become the white-hot center of the industry. Commandant Daulerio at Deadspin is not invested in throwing garlands around the necks of pro athletes so much as putting plastic bags over their heads. Lipsyte sees fantasy sports as fans transferring onanistic energies from the players to management. "You're not jerking off to Warren Beatty anymore," he tells me. "You're jerking off to the studio head." OK, but I see fantasy as a Timothy Leary drop-out that Lipsyte should be proud of—the ultimate undermining of SportsWorld.

"Sports," Lipsyte writes in An Accidental Sportswriter, "has lost almost all its moral cachet and is accepted as a branch of the entertainment industry." Indeed, the Web's sportswriters treat sports like action movies: See the way that Bill Simmons toggles between a dissection of the Red Sox and a dissection of The Town. These new writers may rarely delve into the murky waters of race and politics and gender. But nor do they go for the dime-novel fabulism like Lipsyte's Times battery mate Arthur Daley. The new writers haven't inherited Lipsyte's moral muscle but they have inherited his hipness, his suspicion. Which is something.

Another way of saying this is that, these days, we may not know what kind of sportswriters we should be, but we know what kind we shouldn't. Proof comes from a wonderful scene in An Accidental Sportswriter in which Bob Costas takes Lipsyte to lunch. Bob C. always thought Bob L. was a sourpuss, too "corrosive." (Lipsyte wrote about Mickey Mantle's organ-transplant line-hopping while Costas was eulogizing The Mick into Mitch Albom's version of heaven.) Be happy, Costas had told Lipsyte, and your readers might like you more. Lipsyte: "I was flattered that he had taken the time to mentor me—he was 14 years younger…"

Costas says something revealing during that lunch: "Now, the prevailing tone [in the sports media] is so mean you have to play it straight. … There's more of a need to celebrate." On the one hand, this is self-serving jive, since Bob Costas is going to celebrate sports as surely as Chef Boyardee is going to celebrate ravioli. But on the other, what Costas calls a new "meanness" is really the kind of sportswriterly hard-headedness that Lipsyte pined for. A communal pirate spirit. A Lypsitism, flowering all over the blogosphere and beyond.

* * *

Though he raced away from the Times at 33, Lipsyte never managed to get away from sports. He interviewed Joe DiMaggio and Mickey Mantle for CBS News Sunday Morning and wrote several young adult novels about sports. His yellowing columns and features had a nice afterlife, too. When David Remnick wrote King of the World, his book about Muhammad Ali, he installed Lipsyte—not Red Smith—as the Greek chorus.

In 1991, Lipsyte began a second, 12-year tour as a New York Times sports columnist, his socially conscious ears twitching once again. He reported on gay athletes and learned to love NASCAR. He later materialized on ESPN.com's Page 2, John Walsh's magic cornfield where accidental sportswriters David Halberstam, Ralph Wiley, and Hunter Thompson showed up to take a few final swings. (Bill Simmons was Ray Kinsella, the young guy looking around in wide-eyed wonder.)

Today, young New York lit'ry people know the name Lipsyte because of Bob's son, Sam, a crack novelist—the career Bob set out for in 1957. That points to the hole in these memoirs. Lipsyte gave five decades to sports when he had (hell, has) the literary talent to write about anything. You can write about race and class and gender through the prism of sports, but you can also, you know, write about race and class and gender.

I almost wince when I ask him the question he taught me to ask myself: Is sportswriting worth it?

"I honestly don't know how to answer that question," Lipsyte begins. "I'm very happy with my life, particularly now. It's led me into a lot of wonderful places. I've gotten an enormous amount of pleasure writing the teenage books which are sports related."

"I do remember an emotional feeling on Election Nights, when for some reason or another I'd have to go into the paper. Everybody was wired into really momentous events in the life of the democracy. I was going back to, I don't know, check on a score in my column. There was always a lot of free food—great-looking sandwiches and coffee and buns. But I could never bring myself to take one. It was like I didn't deserve it."

"At 73, do I sometimes think, What am I going to do when I grow up? I really do. Maybe that's one of the reasons I get so much vicarious pleasure out of Sam's career, which is what I thought I would be doing."

I asked him why he kept returning to sportswriting when he'd so painstakingly documented its flaws. "Was it comfort? Was it fear? I sometimes thought I could make my will prevail as a sportswriter in ways I couldn't… I thought I would be free to say what I wanted to say."

He thought about his readers. "Sports journalism is probably the first portal into journalism for many people—younger readers, for sure. And the lies they are told probably will be longer lasting and more powerful. It's like getting steroids at a young age or getting concussed in peewee."

"I never stopped believing that sports is the most fun you have with your body in public," Lipsyte continues. "But this shit we're covering, it's not sports."

We may no longer go in for mythic junk like the Four Horsemen, young sportswriter, but we submit ourselves to other mythic structures, like a three-day, 16-hour televised NFL Draft. We confuse sports with a sportscast. There are still a whopping number of great stories to be written on the sports beat. But most of them must be delivered from on the peninsula, where Bob is standing, casting a rueful eye on the whole show. I'd like to call him the most important sportswriter of the 20th century. Bob convinced me that pompous declarations are for lesser mortals.

Plus: Check out Book Beast for more news on hot titles and authors and excerpts from the latest books.

Bryan Curtis is a national correspondent at The Daily Beast. He was a columnist at Play: The New York Times Sports Magazine, Slate, and Texas Monthly, and has written for GQ, Outside, and New York. Write him at bryan.curtis at thedailybeast.com.


This ran in the New York Times


August 19, 2011
Boys and Reading: Is There Any Hope?
By ROBERT LIPSYTE

At an American Library Association conference in 2007, HarperCollins dressed five of its male young adult authors in blue baseball jerseys with our names on the back and sent us up to bat in a panel entitled “In the Clubhouse.” We were meant to demystify to the overwhelmingly female audience the testosterone code that would get teenage boys reading. Whereas boys used to lag behind girls in reading in the early grades, statistics show, they soon caught up. Not anymore.

We guys had mixed feelings about the game plan: boys’ aversion to reading, let alone to novels, has been worsening for years. But while this certainly posed a problem for us male writers, we felt that we were being treated as a sideshow.

And so we turned from men into boys. Though we ranged in age and style from then 30-­something Kenneth Oppel, a writer of fantasies about ancient beasts (“Darkwing”), to Walter Dean Myers, the 70-­something master of street novels (“Monster”), along with Chris Crutcher (“Whale Talk”) and Terry Trueman (“Stuck in Neutral”), we easily slipped into a cohesive pack. We became stereotypes, smart-aleck teammates — and we were very much on the defensive. It was Us vs. Them.

This is exactly what boys do, in the classroom and in the library, as well as in the clubhouse. If we’re to counter this tendency and encourage reading among boys who may collectively resist it, boys need to be approached individually with books about their fears, choices, possibilities and relationships — the kind of reading that will prick their dormant empathy, involve them with fictional characters and lead them into deeper engagement with their own lives. This is what turns boys into readers.

Given the rich variety in young adult fiction available today, this might seem easy. Not so. “We’re in a kind of golden age of books for teenagers — in fact, the best ones are more satisfying reads than most of the best books published for adults,” said Donald Gallo, a Y.A. anthologist and retired English professor at Central Connecticut State University, when I spoke to him by phone. “The important question is why aren’t boys reading the good books being published?”

He ticked off the standard answers: Boys gravitate toward nonfiction. Schools favor classics over contemporary fiction to satisfy testing standards and avoid challenges from parents. And teachers don’t always know what’s out there for boys. All true, in my opinion.

There are other theories. On his Web site, guysread.com, the teacher and author Jon Scieszka writes that boys “don’t feel comfortable exploring the emotions and feelings found in fiction. . . . Boys don’t have enough positive male role models for literacy. Because the majority of adults involved in kids’ reading are women, boys might not see reading as a masculine activity.”

But I think it’s also about the books being published. Michael Cart, a past president of the Young Adult Library Services Association, agrees. “We need more good works of realistic fiction, nonfiction, graphic novels, on- or ­offline, that invite boys to reflect on what kinds of men they want to become,” he told me. “In a commercially driven publishing environment, the emphasis is currently on young women.” And then some. At the 2007 A.L.A. conference, a Harper executive said at least three-­quarters of her target audience were girls, and they wanted to read about mean girls, gossip girls, frenemies and vampires.

Naturally, authors are writing for this ready group. The current surge in children’s literature has been fueled by talented young female novelists fresh from M.F.A. programs who in earlier times would have been writing midlist adult fiction. Their novels are bought by female editors, stocked by female librarians and taught by female teachers. It’s a cliché but mostly true that while teenage girls will read books about boys, teenage boys will rarely read books with predominately female characters.

Children’s literature didn’t always bear this overwhelmingly female imprint. Like most readers growing up in the 1940s and ’50s, before the advent of the Y.A. genre, I went directly from children’s books about explorers to Steinbeck and Hemingway. But my son, Sam, a novelist who grew up in the ’70s, was able to go from “Goodnight Moon” to the burgeoning category of Y.A. literature.

The books that Sam read differed from the current crop in one significant way: They tended not to be gender-­specific. Many early Y.A. writers were women who wrote well about both genders, like the queen of coming-­of-­age lit, Judy Blume (“Forever”). Others wrote under the guise of asexual initials: S. E. Hinton ("The Outsiders") and M. E. Kerr (“Gentlehands”). The better male writers also wrote about both boys and girls: John Donovan (“I’ll Get There. It Better Be Worth the Trip”), Paul Zindel (“The Pigman”) and Robert Cormier, my hero in the field and author of the 1974 classic, “The Chocolate War.” To me, that book exemplifies what’s currently missing: here was a tale of fascistic adults and teenage bullying at a Catholic boys high school, and, controversially and crucially, it lacked a redemptive resolution, one of Cormier’s trademarks.

But the next spate of Y.A. fiction tended to be simplistic problem novels that read like after-school specials, and soon split along gender lines. Books with story lines about disease, divorce, death and dysfunction sold better for girls than did similar books for boys. The shift seemed to fundamentally alter the Y.A. landscape.

To me and I think to many prospective readers, today’s books for boys — supernatural space-and-sword epics that read like video game manuals and sports novels with preachy moral messages — often seem like cynical appeals to the lowest common denominator. Boys prefer video games and ESPN to book versions of them. These knockoffs also lack the tough, edgy story lines that allow boys a private place to reflect on the inner fears of failure and humiliation they try so hard to brush over. Editors who ask writers of books for boys to include girl characters — for commercial reasons — further blunt the edges.

The argument over boys’ reading is not just about gender. This is business, not prejudice. Why publish books if they never reach prospective readers? That many of the edgy books boys would like to read are either not taught or are banned does nothing to promote the cause.

This is why I felt compelled to describe, at the 2007 A.L.A. conference, my interactions with readers of my 2006 novel “Raiders Night,” a book frequently banned by male principals and superintendents (many of them former coaches) for its depiction of the drug and hazing underside of high school football. But the boys who read it are quick to relate to its touchy subject matter. At one school I visited in suburban Chicago, a female teacher, working with a female librarian, had been slipping “Raiders Night” to dozens of boys, mostly athletes.

These “reluctant” readers were eager to talk to me about their reading experiences. They talked about not trusting coaches who, they said, send you in hurt, and lie about your playing time and play you off against your friends. They felt trapped — they loved the fellowship, the physical contact, the prestige of the game. They even talked, gingerly, about playing because Dad wants you to and how you could be kept in line by the fear of being called a girl or gay. This was hard-core boy talk, but it was also book talk — the fictional characters we were discussing allowed us the freedom to express feelings the way girls do. Would this conversation ever have taken place without a literary impetus?

A number of boys thought the book’s ending, in which the hero makes what I considered the moral choice of protecting the weak and not the team, was “messed up.” A real jock, they told me, does whatever he needs to do to win, and right or wrong has nothing to do with it.

I told them I had a reading list for them. This ran on April 8, 2009. on the USA Today Op-Ed page. The PGA was so angry it asked its members to complain. Did they ever.



WHY I WRITE YA NOVELS

This piece ran in the New York Times.


At a tough branch library in Philadelphia -- there were more guards than librarians -- a teenage boy I thought had slept through my speech stood up and asked, ''Do you use drugs when you write?''
He seemed disappointed when I just said no, but not as disappointed as I was at giving the same answer to the next question, from a girl who had seemed entranced by my every word. She asked, ''Are you rich enough now to stop writing?''
Sometimes I think that questions from teenage readers are the real payoff in writing books marketed as ''young adult literature.'' There is a reader-writer connection in this category that simply does not exist in sports journalism, movies, television news and documentaries, and novels for older adults, genres in which I've been called a genius and a jerk because I stroked or ruffled someone's feathers. Readers in middle school and high school have taken me to task for things that have happened to my characters -- their characters, they think -- but always in the context of the work itself. Their minds were open to the story and to what they thought I was saying, whether or not they agreed. That's why writing for them is the most satisfying writing I do.
That satisfaction is something all of us who regularly write for teenagers try to keep in mind when people ask us what we plan to do when we grow up. It's touchy. Most of us started out thinking we'd be writing about a King Lear, not a Kid Lear.
I know exactly when I became a writer for young adults. On Nov. 20, 1965, a few minutes after 9 p.m. Las Vegas time, I was sitting at a darkened poolside outside a casino hotel with an old boxing manager I had taken to dinner. He was reminiscing about his glory days when he owned a gym on East 14th Street in Manhattan. Late at night, he said, he would sit at the top of three dark, twisting flights of stairs. He would be waiting for that special kid to climb up, alone, fighting his fear of the unknown because his life on the streets below was so desperate.
A kid who used his fear as fuel, the old manager said, would have a chance to become a contender. Becoming the champion, he said, is often the luck of the draw, but being a contender, a somebody with promise, is about hard work and character.
The picture of those stairs stayed with me all through the fight I had been sent to cover -- Muhammad Ali beat Floyd Patterson -- and all the way home. I became inflamed with the picture, and wondered: What kind of kid would dare to come up those steps? What would be going on in his life? What would he find at the top?
I wondered what I needed to do to become a contender; what were my narrow twisting stairs? I was a boxing writer for this paper; I had worked on a nonfiction book, helping Dick Gregory write his autobiography, ''Nigger''; and I had sold some short stories, but I had never written a novel. Would the chapters of a novel be my steps up to becoming a contender?
When I got back to New York, there was a letter from one Ferdinand Monjo at Harper & Row. He wondered if I had ever thought of writing a book with boxing as its milieu -- a common boxing term, milieu. I called Mr. Monjo right up and began babbling about a book titled ''The Contender.'' There would be three flights of stairs in it. Mr. Monjo said, ''Go right ahead, dear boy,'' and in my innocence, thank goodness, I thought that was a contract.
Ferdinand Monjo was a terrific editor, and he was surrounded by terrific editors: Charlotte Zolotow, a well-known children's book author who became my editor later, and Ursula Nordstrom, their boss, who just about invented the young adult genre. I knew nothing about children's books then; I was just writing my novel, with boxing as its milieu. But because it was linear, had a 17-year-old protagonist and no sex, it was right for that new genre. And for the times.
Government money was available, there was a need for books with minority protagonists, and perhaps most important there was a generation of librarians and teachers open to stories that were closer to the bone of contemporary teenagers' real lives.
The letters have never stopped coming, more than you would think from white Iowa farm girls who said they identified with Alfred Brooks, a black high school dropout. In my school and library visits, young black men, once they got past their mixed feelings about my whiteness, wanted to talk about what I should write next. They had definite ideas about what should happen to some of the characters. Alfred's best friend, James, whom they all liked, would certainly die before the next book, they said; he was a junkie, they knew him well, he didn't stand a chance.
But it didn't matter because I had no intention of writing any more novels for teenagers. It was King Lear time. Even though ''The Contender'' did well enough to buy a suburban house and help send my two children to college, that genre flourished without me. Stars such as M. E. Kerr, Paul Zindel, S. E. Hinton, Richard Peck, Robert Cormier and Walter Dean Myers brought to the genre a grittier and even a more literary sensibility than existed in mainstream fiction. (Young adult fiction keeps getting better. I was amazed five years ago, as a National Book Award judge, at how hard it was to choose one winner from so much good, smart writing.)
Ten years after my first novel, while writing an essay for Mother Jones magazine about books that had influenced me, the phrase ''in the prison of my fat'' fell out of the typewriter. I had never before consciously thought about how trapped I had felt as an overweight kid, hating my body and finding comfort in reading and writing. In my earliest fiction, thin people died horribly.
That night I started writing my second novel for teenagers, ''One Fat Summer,'' an emotionally true story of my 14th summer during which I lost perhaps 40 pounds. (I don't know exactly because I always jumped off the scale as it rolled up toward 200.)
That 1977 novel started a flood of letters, the best from very tall girls who identified with the fat boy. During my school visits, chubby apprentice writers, once they got past their mixed feelings that I had kept most of the weight off, asked me to recount particularly horrible ways to kill thin classmates, who themselves were listening with what seemed to be horrified interest and new empathy.
In 1997 ''One Fat Summer'' was briefly banned at a school in Levittown, N.Y., because of a passage dealing with masturbation that I don't remember writing. Censorship became a source of pride because it connected me to Francesca Lia Block, the most exciting writer of young adult fiction to emerge in recent years, and to my hero in the field, Judy Blume, who may simply be the most influential writer of our time. She has made a positive difference in thousands of young people's lives.
This, of course, is the secret allure of writing for teenagers. There is a messianic streak to what we do; at the very least we think we are teachers as much as we are artists. If you do this long enough, people who claim we made a difference in their lives write or call to say they have given copies of our books to their children.
Because school sales are often critical to our books' success, we tend to meet our readers more often than many other writers do. As we age (and as our own children age), meeting teenagers and sometimes spending time alone talking with them becomes an important part of staying in touch with our readers and characters. What that also does is spawn sequels. When kids begin talking about characters you created 30 years ago as if they were friends, the need to revisit them becomes overwhelming. Nostalgia has created more sequels than marketing. This year I've been going to schools to talk about ''Warrior Angel,'' the fourth in a series that began with that first book, ''The Contender.'' Of my nine novels for teenagers, that latest one was the toughest to write.
It was a high school student's question that made me understand why. She stood up after I spoke, a little grin on her face, and asked me if winning the American Library Association's Margaret A. Edwards Award for lifetime achievement in young adult literature in 2001 had put pressure on me to write better. This time I just said yes.
I thanked her for asking. Only a teenager would ask a question like that, a real question that acknowledged me as a real person trying to make some sense out of real lives. What I didn't say was that maybe this book would make me rich enough to stop writing. Or to afford the drugs to keep me writing forever.



I

This was a talk I gave at the Narrative Matters conference of the journal Health Affairs last year.



I FEEL OVERWHELMED THIS MORNING BY THE RESPONSIBILITY OF REPRESENTING THE PATIENT, AN INCREDIBLY DIVERSE GROUP DEMOGRAPHICALLY, ALSO DIVIDED BY PAIN, PROGNOSIS AND HEALTH INSURANCE. PLUS I BELIEVE THAT THE CAREGIVER IS A NEEDIER CONSTITUENCY. I KNOW WE’LL GET TO THEM LATER.
BUT I DO HAVE PATIENT CRED. I KNOW WHAT IT FEELS LIKE TO SIT NAKED ON TISSUE PAPER, MOUTH DRY, HEART FLOPPING, CLAWING AT THE PLASTIC HIDE OF THE EXAMINING TABLE. IT IS NOT A POSITION OF POWER. AFTER ABOUT 15 MINUTES, WHEN THE PAPER IS ADHERING, SHIFTING WITH ME, MY IMAGINATION STARTS METASTASIZING; EVERY SYRINGE, CATHETER AND SCALPEL IN THE CABINET – I ALWAYS PEEK - HAS MY NAME ON IT.
I WANT TO TALK TODAY ABOUT MY IMAGINATION, FRIGHTENING BUT ALSO EMPOWERING FOR PATIENT. I’VE ALWAYS HAD A RICH FANTASY LIFE – I’M A WRITER – BUT IN THE PAST 30 YEARS, SINCE I FIRST BECAME A MAJOR LEAGUE PATIENT – BY THAT I MEAN SOMEONE WITH A REALLY SCARY-SOUNDING DISEASE TREATED REGULARLY AT A TEACHING HOSPITAL, THE KIND OF DISEASE THAT MAKES PEOPLE SAY, “HOW ARE YOU?” – THAT’S KEY: “HOW ARE YOU?” IS A KIND OF HELLO OR WASSUP? AND “HOW ARE YOU?” CAN LEAD TO BEING NAKED NOT ON TISSUE PAPER, BUT “HOW ARE YOU?” MEANS YOU’RE STILL ALIVE? BY THE TIME I GOT TO THAT “HOW ARE YOU?” STAGE, MY FANTASY LIFE HAD LEAD ME TO THE THREE MAJOR FANTASIES OF MY PATIENTHOOD.
FANTASY NUMBER ONE – I WILL SEDUCE MY DOCTOR.
FANTASY NUMBER TWO – I WILL CALL A STAFF MEETING OF ALL MY DOCTORS.
FANTASY NUMBER THREE – I WILL FORM A PATIENTS UNION.
FANTASY NUMBER ONE, THE SEDUCTION FANTASY: I DON’T MEAN THIS IN ANY SEXUAL WAY - IF YOU CAN HAVE SEXUAL DAYDREAMS YOU AREN’T AS SICK AS YOU SHOULD BE FOR THE PURPOSES OF OUR DISCUSSION. SEDUCING YOUR DOCTOR MEANS LIFTING YOURSELF OUT OF YOUR CHART, PAST YOUR DIAGNOSIS AND INTO THEIR MENTAL FACEBOOK - SOMEHOW MAKING THEM REALIZE THAT YOU ARE A HUMAN BEING, TOO. GETTING THEM INTERESTED IN YOU. PERHAPS REMINDING THEM OF SOMEONE IN THEIR FAMILY – HOPEFULLY SOMEONE THEY LIKE SINCE YOU WANT THEM VESTED IN YOUR BEING WELL OR AT LEAST IN GETTING BETTER.
THERE ARE VARIOUS TECHNIQUES – INTIMIDATION DOESN’T ALWAYS WORK, ALTHOUGH I TEND TO DRESS UP A BIT FOR IMPORTANT MEDICAL VISITS, SOMETIMES EVEN A TIE, TO GIVE THE IMPRESSION THAT I AM EITHER A LAWYER OR WENT TO SCHOOL WITH A FEW.
SEDUCTION ALSO INCLUDES A LOT OF WHAT MIGHT GENEROUSLY BE CALLED “FINESSING.” IN OTHER TIMES AND PLACES IT HAS BEEN CALLED “FLIRTING” OR “TOMMING.” WE COULD ALSO CALL IT “CAJOLING”…WHETHER IT’S SYMPATHIZING WITH HOW HARD YOUR POOR DOCTOR WORKS, COMMISERATING WITH THE X-RAY TECH WHO WAS LATE FOR YOUR APPOINTMENT BECAUSE HE HAD TO WAIT FOREVER ON A STARBUCKS LINE, OR GENTLY SLOWING DOWN THE JITTERY PHLEBOTOMIST WHOM YOU CAN TELL IS GOING TO JAB THREE TIME BEFORE SHE SPIKES YOUR VEIN.
WHEN MY LATE WIFE WAS IN HER FINAL ILLNESS AT MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING, THERE WAS A TENDENCY FOR DOCTORS AND NURSES TO AVOID HER ROOM OR LEAVE QUICKLY – ULTIMATELY WE UNDERSTOOD THERE WASN’T MUCH THEY COULD DO TO KEEP HER ALIVE, BUT PLENTY THEY COULD DO TO ALLEVIATE HER PAIN – IF THEY COULD BE MADE TO FEEL IT. MY DAUGHTER CAME UP WITH THE IDEA OF DECORATING THE ROOM WITH PHOTOS OF MARGIE AS A YOUNGER, HEALTHY WOMAN. IT NOT ONLY LIGHTENED THE MOOD, BUT IT SEDUCED THE DOCTORS AND NURSES. THEY LINGERED TO LOOK AT THE PICTURES, WHICH WERE NOW DISTANT LIKENESSES OF THE PATIENT IN THE BED, BUT THEY MADE HER INTO A HUMAN BEING. SHE GOT MORE ATTENTION AND MORE REGULAR PAIN MEDICATION.
WHEN MY FATHER BECAME BRIEFLY ILL FOR THE FIRST TIME, I TRIED TO GIVE HIM SEDUCTION TIPS BUT HE WAVED THEM AWAY. HE HATED DOCTORS, NEVER WENT FOR CHECKUPS. HE WAS SITTING NAKED ON TISSUE PAPER WHEN A FIFTY-ISH DOCTOR SWEPT IN, EXPRESSED ANGER THAT THIS MAN HAD NO MEDICAL RECORD AND SAID, “WHEN WAS YOUR LAST EXAM?”
COOLLY, MY DAD SAID, “BEFORE YOU WERE BORN.”
“I DOUBT THAT,” SNORTED THE DOCTOR.
“IT WAS BEFORE MY LAST PROMOTION TO DIRECTOR OF FIFTY SCHOOLS AT THE NEW YORK CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION,” SAID DAD. “THAT WOULD BE 1959.”
“I WAS TWELVE,” SAID THE DOCTOR, CLEARLY INTERESTED NOW. “HOW OLD ARE YOU?”
“GUESS.”
“SEVENTY-FOUR.”
“YOU ARE A GRACIOUS GENTLEMAN,” SAID MY FATHER. “I AM 90.”
AND I WAS FLABBERGASTED. WHAT MOVES THE OLD MAN HAD. THE DOCTOR DIDN’T WANT TO LET HIM GO. TOOK A FULL HISTORY. HE HAD BEEN SEDUCED. LUCKILY, THERE WASN’T ANYTHING THE DOCTOR COULD DO SO DAD LIVED ANOTHER TEN YEARS. HE DIED THREE MONTHS SHORT OF HIS 101ST BIRTHDAY, A SHREWD SURVIVALIST TO THE VERY END.
FANTASY NUMBER TWO: I WILL CALL A MEETING OF ALL MY DOCTORS, WHICH CURRENTLY INCLUDES A PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIAN, AN OPHTHALMOLOGIST, UROLOGIST, ONCOLOGIST, GASTROENTEROLOGIST, CARDIOLOGIST, NEUROSURGEON, DENTIST, DERMATOLOGIST, AUDIOLOGIST, OSTEOPATH AND PODIATRIST, ALL OF WHOM I HAVE SEEN RECENTLY, BUT NEVER AS A GROUP. WHEN I’VE GOT THEM TOGETHER, I WILL ASK THE THREE KEY QUESTIONS OF THIS NATION’S – AS WELL AS MY OWN -- HEALTH CARE CRISIS, QUESTIONS AS CRITICAL TO ASK DOCTORS AS POLITICIANS: WILL YOU GET PAST YOUR PARTISANSHIP TO TALK TO EACH OTHER, WILL YOU FEEL MY PAIN AND ARE YOUR HANDS CLEAN?
WILL YOU GET PAST YOUR PARTISANSHIP TO TALK TO EACH OTHER?
DESPITE WHAT WE SEE ON “HOUSE,” “ER,” AND “GREY’S ANATOMY,” WHERE TV DOCS TALK ENDLESSLY ABOUT THEIR PATIENTS (OFTEN WHILE VERY, VERY CLOSE TO EACH OTHER) REAL DOCS MOSTLY TALK ABOUT BILLING PROCEDURES. IT’S SOMETHING THEY HAVE IN COMMON. MEDICALLY, THEY ARE SEPARATED BY THEIR SPECIALTIES. MY OPHTHALMOLOGIST, GASTROENTEROLOGIST, UROLOGIST AND PODIATRIST MIGHT AS WELL BE EXPLORING DIFFERENT PLANETS. WHILE EACH IS PREPARED TO TAKE HEROIC MEASURES TO SAVE A SPECIFIC BODY PART, IT’S HARD TO GET THEM TO TREAT ME AS A COMPLETE SYSTEM.

I’M SINCERELY GRATEFUL TO THE ONCOLOGIST FOR COMING UP WITH A CHEMO COCKTAIL THAT KNOCKED BACK MY RECENT SECOND RECURRENCE OF THAT THIRTY-YEAR-OLD CANCER, BUT I WONDER IF HE HAD KNOWN ME BETTER, THAT I WAS A MUSIC LOVER, IF HE WOULD HAVE PRESCRIBED THE DRUG THAT HAS DAMAGED MY HEARING.

MAYBE UNDER THE PRESENT HEALTH CARE SYSTEM DOCTORS DON’T HAVE THE TIME OR THE FINANCIAL INCENTIVE TO TALK TO EACH OTHER MORE ABOUT THEIR PATIENTS. MAYBE THEY CHOSE SPECIALTIES SO THEY COULD BE IN EXCLUSIVE CLUBS AND NOT HAVE TO TALK TO OUTSIDERS. MAYBE WE HAVE TO FIND WAYS TO GET THEM TO MEET AND MINGLE. I’LL VOTE FOR THE CANDIDATE WHO NAILS THAT INTO A PLATFORM.
WILL YOU FEEL MY PAIN?
THIRTY YEARS AGO, BEFORE AN OPERATION, A SURGEON TOLD ME THAT I WOULDN’T FEEL A THING. I ASKED HIM IF HE HAD EVER GONE UNDER THE KNIFE? HE STORMED OUT OF MY ROOM. MOST DOCTORS STILL DON’T REALLY KNOW WHAT WE GO THROUGH ALTHOUGH THERE SEEMS TO BE A MOVEMENT TOWARD GREATER UNDERSTANDING. WHEN DOCTORS DO GET SICK THEY TEND TO HAVE REVELATIONS AND WRITE BOOKS ABOUT IT.
I THINK DOCTORS SHOULD BE MADE AT LEAST A LITTLE SICK TO QUALIFY FOR THEIR LICENSES, AND SURGEONS SHOULD HAVE TO UNDERGO AT LEAST A MINOR OPERATION.
ARE YOUR HANDS CLEAN?
THERE ARE CROOKED DOCTORS, LIKE CROOKED POLITICIANS, BUT THIS QUESTION IS A LITERAL ONE. I THINK THE TOUGHEST QUESTION TO ASK A HEALTH CARE PROVIDER ABOUT TO TOUCH YOUR BODY IS, “DID YOU WASH YOUR HANDS?” AT ONE OF MY FAVORITE HANG-OUTS, THE MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER, THERE ARE SANITIZING DISPENSERS EVERYWHERE AND STAFF MEMBERS SOMETIMES WEAR BLUE BUTTONS WITH A GERM IN A TARGET AND THE SIMPLE ORDER “WASH HANDS.”
IT’S WELL-KNOWN THAT THOUSANDS OF AMERICANS GET SICK EVERY YEAR FROM DISEASES CONTRACTED IN HOSPITALS. BUT MOST PATIENTS DON’T ASK THE TOUGH QUESTION BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT COMFORTABLE ENOUGH WITH THEIR DOCTORS OR THE MEDICAL ENVIRONMENT TO ASK IT IN A FRIENDLY, NON-CHALLENGING WAY AND THEY ARE AFRAID OF CAUSING ANTAGONISM.
WE NEED TO BE MADE EQUAL PARTNERS IN THE SYSTEM, SO WE CAN TALK FREELY. WE NEED TO BE CALM AND ASSERTIVE AS PATIENTS, AND THAT’S VERY HARD WHEN YOU FEEL SCARED, RUSHED, POWERLESS.

FOR ALL THE POLICY WONK DISCUSSIONS ABOUT MANDATED CARE FOR ALL /​/​ VERSUS AFFORDABLE CARE, SINGLE PAYER GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS LIKE MEDICARE VERSUS PRIVATE POLICIES, THE HEART OF HEALTH CARE REFORM IS ABOUT THE DOCTOR AND THE PATIENT FINDING THEIR WAY TOGETHER TOWARD COMPASSIONATE CARE. ACTUALLY, JUST THINKING ABOUT ALL OF THIS GIVES ME STRESS. I AM GOING TO ADD A PSYCHIATRIST TO MY PERSONAL MEDICAL STAFF MEETING.
FANTASY NUMBER THREE: I WILL FORM A PATIENTS UNION
AS YOU RECALL, WE LEFT ME NAKED ON TISSUE PAPER. WELL, FINALLY, A FULLY-DRESSED HUMAN BEING IN A WHITE COAT MARCHES INTO THE ROOM, WEARY AND IMPATIENT, AND, WHILE READING FROM A FOLDER THAT I HOPE HAS MY NAME ON IT, DEMANDS, ''SO. WHAT SEEMS TO BE THE TROUBLE?''
IF THIS WERE A TRUE STORY, I WOULD MUMBLE, ''I'M REALLY SORRY TO BOTHER YOU, DOCTOR, BUT. . . .''
THIS IS A FANTASY. I SMILE CONFIDENTLY AS I GESTURE AT A PERSON SITTING QUIETLY IN A CORNER AND SAY: ''THIS IS MY PATIENTS UNION REPRESENTATIVE, DOCTOR. YOU DON'T MIND IF WE VIDEOTAPE THE SESSION?''
IN 30 YEARS OF SERIOUS TRAVEL IN WHAT I CALL MALADY, THE COUNTRY OF ILLNESS, AS PATIENT AND CAREGIVER, I HAVE COME TO BE CERTAIN ONLY OF THIS: YOU MUST NEVER CROSS THE BORDER INTO THAT COUNTRY BY YOURSELF. AT BEST, YOUR TRAVELING COMPANION SHOULD HAVE ADVANCED DEGREES IN ACCOUNTING, DIPLOMACY, LAW, MEDICINE AND COMEDY. THAT IS A FANTASY EVEN I DON'T ENTERTAIN.


TOO OFTEN WE MAKE THE JOURNEY ALONE, SICK AND SCARED, VULNERABLE TO BULLYING BILLING CLERKS, SNIDE RECEPTIONISTS, OVERWORKED TECHNICIANS AND NURSES AND DOCTORS WHO CAN RARELY TAKE THE TIME TO LISTEN TO A HISTORY THAT CAN INSURE A FUTURE.
SO. LET ME INTRODUCE THE PATIENTS UNION. AT ITS MOST PERSONAL LEVEL, YOUR PATIENTS UNION LOCAL WOULD SUPPLY A SIDEKICK, A SEASONED TRAVELER IN MALADY, TO BE A SECOND PAIR OF EYES AND EARS AT A DOCTOR'S APPOINTMENT AND AT A MEETING WITH YOUR HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY OR WITH THE HOSPITAL'S FINANCIAL DEPARTMENT. MEANWHILE, THE NATIONAL ORGANIZATION WOULD BE PICKETING GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, H.M.O.'S AND DRUG COMPANIES THAT AREN'T ACTING IN YOUR BEST INTERESTS.
WHEN I SAY ALL THIS, AND IT HAS MOSTLY BEEN SAID AT PARTIES AFTER THE MEDICINAL RED WINE, THE DOCTORS AT THE TABLE SMILE TIGHTLY OR ROLL THEIR EYES OR, IF THEY UNDERSTAND THAT I AM NOT KIDDING, SHIFT UNCOMFORTABLY AS IF ON TISSUE PAPER. IT IS HARD FOR THEM TO UNDERSTAND THAT THE PATIENTS UNION DOES NOT NECESSARILY CONSIDER DOCTORS TO BE THE CENTRAL TARGET OF PROTEST AND CHANGE . THAT’S BECAUSE THEY HAVE ALWAYS CHERISHED THEIR CENTRALITY TO MEDICINE. MY COLLEGE ROOM-MATES, BLESS THEM, ARE DOCTORS, AND EVERYTHING HAS ALWAYS BEEN ALL ABOUT THEM. BUT NOW WE ARE ALL CAUGHT IN A TITANIC MEDICAL-CORPORATE COMPLEX.
WE NEED TO SEIZE CONTROL OF THE BRIDGE AND-OR THE LIFEBOATS – BEFORE THIS SHIP SINKS BY BANDING TOGETHER AS BOLDLY AS THE DOCTORS, NURSES, HOSPITALS AND ACCOUNTANTS HAVE. WE ARE THE ONE ELEMENT THAT EVEN THE ULTIMATE G.E.-DISNEY-GOOGLE-AMA-MICROSOFT H.M.O. CAN NEVER COMPLETELY CONTROL OR CONTAIN. WE ARE THE ONE ELEMENT THEY CAN NEVER DO WITHOUT – WE ARE THEIR RAW MATERIAL, PRODUCT, CUSTOMER BASE, CONSTITUENCY. WITHOUT SICK PEOPLE, THEY ARE DEAD.
BUT SICK PEOPLE AND THEIR CAREGIVERS HAVE TRADITIONALLY BEEN BALKANIZED NOT ONLY BY AGE, RACE, GENDER, CLASS AND MONEY BUT, MOST CRITICALLY, BY DISEASE.

ALMOST EVERY MAJOR MALADY HAS ITS OWN LABORATORY AND LOBBYIST, NATIONAL SOCIETY, CELEBRITY CHAIR, BOARD OF FAMOUS DOCTORS AND, TOO OFTEN, FINANCING FROM A DRUG COMPANY PROFITING FROM THE DISEASE. EACH MALADY COMPETES WITH OTHER MALADIES FOR GOVERNMENT MONEY, PUBLICITY AND TV MOVIES.
WHILE THE GALLANTRY AND MEDIA SAVVY OF THE AIDS BANDWAGON PLAYED ON, THE BREAST CANCER FORCES LEARNED AND PROSPERED. THEN THE PROSTATE PATIENTS STEPPED UP – LESS SUCCESSFULLY BECAUSE BOYS ARE ALWAYS IN COMPETITION - MY PROSTATE IS BIGGER THAN YOURS. THEN DEPRESSION, SCHIZOPHRENIA, BIPOLAR DISORDERS, AUTISM CAME ON STRONG.
DOES THIS MAKE SENSE? CAN YOU IMAGINE IF THOSE DISEASES JOINED FORCES, IF THEY INCLUDED THE SUFFERERS OF LUPUS, MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, CROHN'S DISEASE, DIABETES, SICKLE-CELL ANEMIA; IF THEY EMBRACED THE MARATHON CAREGIVERS OF PEOPLE WITH CANAVAN'S DISEASE AND ALZHEIMER'S; IF THEY FOUND ROOM FOR THE QUADS, THE HEP C'S, THE ALMOST INVISIBLE HEROES OF CHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH, A CHRONIC, INCURABLE NEUROMUSCULAR DISEASE?
IN MY ORGANIZING SPEECH I WOULD SAY: OUR IMPERFECT UNION OF IMPERFECT PEOPLE WILL INCLUDE THE MEASURED BRAND-TESTING OF THE CONSUMERS UNION AND THE MUSCULAR COERCION OF THE OLD TEAMSTERS' UNION UNDER JIMMY HOFFA.
WHILE OUR CONSUMERS UNION SIDE WILL DISTRIBUTE THOSE BEST DOCTOR-BEST HOSPITAL LISTS THAT THE GLOSSY MAGAZINES LOVE SO MUCH, OUR LISTS WILL INCLUDE MORTALITY, HYGIENE, AFFABILITY AND COST CHARTS.
OUR TEAMSTERS' SIDE WILL HOIST THE INFLATABLE UNION RAT OUTSIDE ANY H.M.O. THAT CUTS SERVICES AND RAISES PRICES.
AT PATIENTS UNION MEETINGS, WE WILL KEEP REMINDING ONE ANOTHER THAT AS CUSTOMERS WE HAVE A RIGHT TO DEMAND SERVICE, TO GET INFORMATION AND TO BE PART OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS, WHICH ULTIMATELY INCLUDES WHO GETS ALL THE NEW DRUGS AND PROCEDURES FOR WHICH WE ARE PAYING THROUGH TAXES AND MEDICAL FEES.

AS FOR MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTS IN THE PATIENTS UNION, ALL YOU NEED IS A PAST OR FUTURE MEDICAL BILL.
EVERYONE WILL GET PATIENTS UNION T-SHIRTS AND BUMPER STICKERS SAYING: P.U. BECAUSE THE SYSTEM STINKS!
THANK YOU. STAY WELL.



BOOKS

My New Memoir
An Accidental Sportswriter
"Jock Culture glorifies the young, the strong and the beautiful, and Lipsyte, the would-be Chekhov, gets the tragic implications. That's why his columns, and this marvelous memoir, 'An Accidental Sportswriter,' are so affecting." --ANN LEVIN, ASSOCIATED PRESS
Fiction
Center Field
A high school baseball player faces a moral challenge
Yellow Flag
A pulse-pounding ride in the world of NASCAR
Raiders Night
"a riveting and chilling look inside contemporary high school football" - *Publishers Weekly
The Contender
Before you can be a champion,
you have to be a contender.

The Brave
Sequel to The Contender
The Chief
Sonny Bear is the champ!
Warrior Angel
The final story in The Contender quartet
One Fat Summer
“You’re bound to like this fat boy right from the start...very funny.”
-Kirkus Reviews
Non-Fiction
Heroes of Baseball
The Men Who Made It America's Favorite Game
In the Country of Illness: Comfort and Advice for the Journey.
Mortality confronted with hard-earned outrage, first at the author's cancer, then his ex-wife's.